Keyboard Shortcuts?

×
  • Next step
  • Previous step
  • Skip this slide
  • Previous slide
  • mShow slide thumbnails
  • nShow notes
  • hShow handout latex source
  • NShow talk notes latex source
\title {Descartes \\ Lecture 04}
 
 
 
\maketitle
 
--------
\subsection{slide-3}
Descartes’ organising question is ...
 
--------
\subsection{slide-6}
This seems true, even today. Why is that?
 
--------
\subsection{slide-11}
‘The main reason why we can find nothing in ordinary philosophy which is so evident and certain as to be beyond dispute is that students of the subject first of all are not content to acknowledge what is clear and certain, but on the basis of merely probably conjectures venture also to make assertions on obscure matters about which nothing is known; they then gradually come to have complete faith in these assertions, ... The result is that the only conclusions they can draw are ones which apparently rest on some such obscure proposition, and which are accordingly uncertain.’ (Rules for the Direction of the Mind, p. 14) \citep[p.~14, AT X:367--8]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-12}
Why do I mention this? I’ve just been moderating your PH146 essays!
 
--------
\subsection{slide-13}
‘in practical life
it is sometimes necessary to act upon opinons which one knows to be quite uncertain just as if they were indubitable’
\citep[p.~126 AT 6:31]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-14}
In devoting ‘myself soley to the search for truth
\citep[p.~127 AT 6:32]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
--------
\subsection{i\_exist}
 
 
\section{I Exist}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-19}
‘I noticed that while I was trying thus to think everything false
it was necessary that I,
who was thinking this,
was something.’
\citep[p.~126 AT 6:31]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-21}
What is thinking?
 
‘By the term ‘thought’, I understand everything which we are aware of as happening within us, in so far as we have awareness of it. Hence, thinking is to be identified here not merely with understanding, willing and imagining, but also with sensory awareness’ \citep[p.~195 AT VIII:7]{descartes:1985_csm1}.
 
--------
\subsection{slide-23}
‘this truth
“I am thinking, therefore I exist”
[is] so firm and sure
that all the most extravagant suppositions of the sceptics [are] incapable of shaking it’
 
I took it as ‘the first principle’.
--------
\subsection{slide-24}
\citep[p.~126 AT 6:31]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-25}
adapted from Hatfield p. 107
 
--------
\subsection{slide-29}
subject, attitude, content
 
--------
\subsection{slide-37}
No!
 
--------
\subsection{slide-38}
‘We clearly understand that it is possible for me to exist at this moment, while I am thinking of one thing, and yet not to exist at the very next moment’
\citep[p.~355 AT V:192]{descartes:1984_vol3}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-43}
adapted from Hatfield p. 107
 
--------
\subsection{slide-46}
Is this argument correct? Any objections?
 
--------
\subsection{slide-50}
‘When someone says 'I am breathing, therefore I exist', if he wants to prove he exists from the fact that there cannot be breathing without existence, he proves nothing, because he would have to prove first that it is true that he is breathing, which is impossible unless he has also proved that he exists’ \citep[p.~98 AT II:37]{descartes:1984_vol3}.
 
‘if I say ‘I am seeing, or I am walking, therefore I exist’, and take this as applying to vision or walking as bodily activities, then the conclusion is not absolutely certain. This is because, as often happens during sleep, it is possible for me to think I am seeing or walking, though my eyes are closed and I am not moving about; such thoughts might even be possible if I had no body at all. But if I take 'seeing' or 'walking' to apply to the actual sense or awareness of seeing or walking, then the conclusion is quite certain, since it relates to the mind, which alone has the sensation or thought that it is seeing or walking’ \citep[p.~195 AT VII:7]{descartes:1985_csm1}.
 
--------
\subsection{slide-52}
What is this ‘I’ doing here? Why isn’t the conclusion just that something exists?
 
--------
\subsection{slide-53}
Note that we are not deducing ‘I exist’ from any general premises ...
 
‘When someone says “I am thinking, therefore I am, or I exist,” he does not deduce existence from thought by means of a syllogism
This is clear from the fact that if he were deducing it by a syllogism, he would previously have had to know the major premise “Everything that thinks is, or exists”
--------
\subsection{slide-56}
yet in fact he learns this from experiencing in his own case that it is impossible that he should think without existing.’
\citep[AT 7:140]{descartes:1985_csm2}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-57}
Descartes’ view is that you know the “Everything that thinks is, or exists” by virtue of knoiwng that you yourself cannot think without existing.
 
--------
\subsection{slide-58}
Confirmed elsewhere ...
 
‘... the truth of the proposition 'I am thinking, therefore I exist.' Now this knowledge is not the work of your reasoning
--------
\subsection{slide-59}
[...] it is something that your mind sees, feels and handles; [...] although your imagination insistently mixes itself up with your thoughts and lessens the clarity of this knowledge by trying to clothe it with shapes
\citep[p.~331 AT V:138]{descartes:1984_vol3}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-60}
adapted from Hatfield p. 107
 
There is no argument.
 
--------
\subsection{slide-62}
recall from the start of the lecture ...
 
--------
\subsection{slide-65}
‘this truth
“I am thinking, therefore I exist”
[is] so firm and sure
that all the most extravagant suppositions of the sceptics [are] incapable of shaking it’
 
I took it as ‘the first principle’.
--------
\subsection{slide-66}
\citep[p.~126 AT 6:31]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
--------
\subsection{slide-67}
One puzzle for us will be what this means. Hatfield suggests one possibility: ‘by offering an instance of certain knowledge, [it] reveals the proper method for attaining knowledge’
 
--------
\subsection{slide-68}
adapted from Hatfield p. 107
 
It is something certain, and it is a ‘first principle’.
 
--------
\subsection{slide-70}
Descartes’ organising question is ...
 
\def \ititle {Lecture 04}
 
\def \isubtitle {Descartes}
 
\begin{center}
 
{\Large
 
\textbf{\ititle}: \isubtitle
 
}
 
 
 
\iemail %
 
\end{center}
 
‘The main reason why we can find nothing in ordinary philosophy which is so evident and certain as to be beyond dispute is that students of the subject first of all are not content to acknowledge what is clear and certain, but on the basis of merely probably conjectures venture also to make assertions on obscure matters about which nothing is known; they then gradually come to have complete faith in these assertions, ... The result is that the only conclusions they can draw are ones which apparently rest on some such obscure proposition, and which are accordingly uncertain.’ (Rules for the Direction of the Mind, p. 14) \citep[p.~14, AT X:367--8]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
‘in practical life
it is sometimes necessary to act upon opinons which one knows to be quite uncertain just as if they were indubitable’
\citep[p.~126 AT 6:31]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
In devoting ‘myself soley to the search for truth
\citep[p.~127 AT 6:32]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
 
 
\section{I Exist}
 
‘I noticed that while I was trying thus to think everything false
it was necessary that I,
who was thinking this,
was something.’
\citep[p.~126 AT 6:31]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
‘By the term ‘thought’, I understand everything which we are aware of as happening within us, in so far as we have awareness of it. Hence, thinking is to be identified here not merely with understanding, willing and imagining, but also with sensory awareness’ \citep[p.~195 AT VIII:7]{descartes:1985_csm1}.
 
‘this truth
“I am thinking, therefore I exist”
[is] so firm and sure
that all the most extravagant suppositions of the sceptics [are] incapable of shaking it’
 
I took it as ‘the first principle’.
\citep[p.~126 AT 6:31]{descartes:1985_csm1}
 
‘We clearly understand that it is possible for me to exist at this moment, while I am thinking of one thing, and yet not to exist at the very next moment’
\citep[p.~355 AT V:192]{descartes:1984_vol3}
 
‘When someone says 'I am breathing, therefore I exist', if he wants to prove he exists from the fact that there cannot be breathing without existence, he proves nothing, because he would have to prove first that it is true that he is breathing, which is impossible unless he has also proved that he exists’ \citep[p.~98 AT II:37]{descartes:1984_vol3}.
 
‘if I say ‘I am seeing, or I am walking, therefore I exist’, and take this as applying to vision or walking as bodily activities, then the conclusion is not absolutely certain. This is because, as often happens during sleep, it is possible for me to think I am seeing or walking, though my eyes are closed and I am not moving about; such thoughts might even be possible if I had no body at all. But if I take 'seeing' or 'walking' to apply to the actual sense or awareness of seeing or walking, then the conclusion is quite certain, since it relates to the mind, which alone has the sensation or thought that it is seeing or walking’ \citep[p.~195 AT VII:7]{descartes:1985_csm1}.
 
‘When someone says “I am thinking, therefore I am, or I exist,” he does not deduce existence from thought by means of a syllogism
This is clear from the fact that if he were deducing it by a syllogism, he would previously have had to know the major premise “Everything that thinks is, or exists”
yet in fact he learns this from experiencing in his own case that it is impossible that he should think without existing.’
\citep[AT 7:140]{descartes:1985_csm2}
 
‘... the truth of the proposition 'I am thinking, therefore I exist.' Now this knowledge is not the work of your reasoning
[...] it is something that your mind sees, feels and handles; [...] although your imagination insistently mixes itself up with your thoughts and lessens the clarity of this knowledge by trying to clothe it with shapes
\citep[p.~331 AT V:138]{descartes:1984_vol3}
 

Click here and press the right key for the next slide (or swipe left)

\title {Descartes \\ Lecture 04}
 
\maketitle
 
\section{I Exist}
 
\section{I Exist}